The South East is the epicentre of Great Britain’s Aerospace Industry, but space start ups are far from easy to get off the ground. This however has not detracted a growing number of investors entering the market in recent years…
Writing exclusively for The Business Magazine, Doug Liddle, CEO, In-Space Missions, argues launching a new business is hard but doing so in space is fraught with even more challenges.
Mr Liddle founded In-Space Missions in Alton before overseeing its acquisition by BAE Systems last year. In-Space design build and operate satellite systems for the private sector.
The company launched their first combined satellite in June. It comprised a total of six payloads for Airbus, Lacuna, SatixFy and Aeternum, as well as In-Space Missions’ own Babel payload. In-Space Missions continue to operate the satellites while in orbit.
Doug Liddle offers the following advice to those seeking to enter the new space race…
While the likes of SpaceX and Blue Origin dominate the headlines, the sector is attracting huge interest across the board. Morgan Stanley predicts that the global space industry could grow from $350bn in 2016 to over $1 trillion by 2040.
The key to success is first understanding just what you’ll be up against: the many economic, tech, operational and regulatory roadblocks that frequently bring firms crashing down to Earth.
It’s also critical to ensure that any solution launched into space is adaptable enough to meet changing market demands. No-one wants a technology turkey orbiting the Earth for the next three decades.
Why is space so hard to crack?
Reusable rockets, lower launch costs and smaller satellites are helping to open up new opportunities for many businesses. Some may want to provide services based on communications, data analytics and imaging the Earth from space. Others may play in sectors as diverse as transportation, energy and mining. But they’ll all face similar challenges.
From the ideas stage to generating revenue could take as long as five years. There will be countless technological issues to tackle, funds to raise, regulators to appease and insurers to sweet talk. Vehicles will need to be launched hundreds of miles above the planet and data will need to be transmitted back down to Earth. It can be a complex undertaking even for companies with some experience in this field. Then what happens if the competition has got there first? US companies have a track record of getting to market ahead of their European rivals who may have had the business idea first. Even worse: what happens if the business idea that prompted the launch is no longer relevant?
How to stay relevant
Ensuring longevity or an approach that can offer flexibility and adaptability is key to any space-based business.
Software-defined satellites are akin to iPhones, in that users can upload their own apps to access specific on-device functions such as cameras and radios, and thereby customise the services they deliver. This would help to cut development and deployment times for space-based services from years to months, weeks or even days.
If or when the market moves on, new software could simply be uploaded to the satellite to keep the business relevant and profitable. It also has value in the defence sector, where requirements can be even more fluid and fast changing.
Software-defined models open up a huge range of possibilities to effectively future-proof any deployment. The advantage for those operating the “platform” is also that they are able to spread the risk if any one customer fails or pulls out, and there are always options to replace these with new businesses.
Read more – Satellite Vu and SSTL combine to double data collection
A hit and miss business
The problem with this new space race, is that it’s making low Earth orbit pretty crowded.
Most satellites orbit at 500-600 kilometres above the planet, putting them at risk of collision especially as most fly over the Earth’s poles many times a day where they often pass extremely close to one another.
The more ‘tech turkeys’ abandoned in space, the higher the chance that these could also collide with a functioning satellite. Space debris is already a mounting problem. We can’t afford to turn the planet’s immediate surroundings into a no-go area. That’s why budding space entrepreneurs and governments must also get better at devising some “rules of the road.”
The UK is taking a lead here in terms of its regulatory processes and strategy of giving launch permission only to firms that have a solid plan for collision avoidance and bringing satellites down at end of life. Everyone needs to be more responsible.
We also need to increase communication between different space actors, so that each knows the right protocols to follow if a collision does appear likely. Otherwise, we’ll see organisations continue to play a high-stakes game of chicken with their space-based assets.
In short, business leaders should be in no doubt of the time, money and resources required to plan a successful launch into space. Yet the prospect remains an alluring one. Remember: if you launch a business in space, it has instantly gone global.
Read more – Science Parks can play a major role in addressing the sectors skill gap argues Chairman of Discovery Park
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
