U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Have Not Kept Pace With the Use of Technology. It's Time To Change Them. | New York Law Journal – Law.com

MENU
CLOSE
MEMBERSHIP PROGRAMS
MEDIA BRANDS
Close
Content Type
Limit Search to
SEARCH
MEMBERSHIP PROGRAMS
About Us |  Contact Us |  Site Map
Advertise |  Customer Service |  Terms of Service
FAQ |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2021 ALM Global, LLC.
All Rights Reserved.

ANALYSIS
Anachronistic and vaguely defined provisions that have been updated to reflect today’s business and technological landscape can lead to aberrant results.
July 01, 2022 at 10:00 AM
8 minute read
Criminal Law
Police handcuffs and books of laws on black background. Wooden gavel and books on wooden table, law concept. Law and order.As the pandemic shifted a significant amount of corporate work onto various software platforms, individuals have had to become conversant in increasingly sophisticated programs that allow them to work remotely. Unfortunately, the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) have not kept pace with this modernization in some areas, especially in cases where a substantive offense related to technology (such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) is not implicated.
Anachronistic and vaguely defined provisions that have been updated to reflect today’s business and technological landscape can lead to aberrant results. For example, the use of “sophisticated means” under §2B1.1(b)(10)(C) as a proxy for complexity often leads to unfair and prejudicial double counting “akin to imposing an extra enhancement for firearms that propel larger caliber bullets.” United States v. Faibish, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101200, at *13 (E.D.N.Y. 2015). Those conducting what may be considered unsophisticated schemes by today’s standards could find themselves exposed to increased sentences originally meant only for offenders who employed more elaborate means to effectuate their schemes. Conversely, someone using what would be considered unsophisticated means today, might also be swept up in this sentencing enhancement.

Already have an account?
*May exclude premium content
By Benjamin Rosenberg
By Elliott Scheinberg
By Bennett L. Gershman and Joel Cohen
By Anthony E. Davis
Drawing Legal Fees Before Paying Out Settlement Proceeds Gets Lawyer Disbarred
New Jersey Law Journal
GC Compensation Chart: Who Made the 2022 Top-Paid GC List?
Corporate Counsel
White & Case Accuses Legal Assistant of Doctoring Reimbursement Requests
New York Law Journal
‘A Legal Morass’: Big Law Builds New Groups for Abortion Legal Landscape
The American Lawyer
The 2022 GC Compensation Survey: Legal Chief Pay Spikes After Pandemic Pause
Corporate Counsel
License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking a tax lawyer with one to three years of experience in corporate and partnership tax law to join our Tax…
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat…
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should …
ANAPOL WEISS is pleased to announce that Riki Strosser, Esq. has joined the firm as Senior Associate.
Dhillon Law Group welcomes Josiah Contarino as an associate in our Newark, New Jersey office.

Don’t miss the crucial news and insights you need to make informed legal decisions. Join New York Law Journal now!
Already have an account? Sign In
The industry-leading media platform offering competitive intelligence to prepare for today and anticipate opportunities for future success.

source

Leave a Comment